This forum has been created for you, so feel free to use it often to share your ideas, insights, and experiences from which we all can learn. Please note that we will remove postings if they: a) are not germane to the subject of education, b) are advertisements or sales pitches, c) contain profanity, obscenity, or comments that are insulting to readers.
Margaret Sanger into the eugenics mix. Margaret Sanger fought for birth control to be legal in the United States when the Comstock laws, passed by an all male Congress in the 1800s, had made them illegal.<<<<
Are yo>>>>>Your criticism of me for criticizing Henry Ford's eugenics without throwing u now seriously defending Margaret Sanger? You are aware of her position on “undesirables” reproducing?
>>>>You claim that any civic participation is membership in a citizenship borg, something you eschew.<<<<
Yes.
>>>> This is untrue, yet you cling to the concept like there's no tomorrow.<<<<
Then you do not understand the Hegelian Dialectic process of thought and behavior control…or you are hoping that others on this forum do not. But I do and you know it, which is why you attack me personally for simply not wanting to live and think as you do.
Your hostile, rude speech is warlike.
crap, crap, crap...commie crap. Most of your opinions are crud and I have explained a zillion times WHY state violence, murder, and theft are just as wrong as when "citizens" commit them....and YOU promote state violence while posturing as so refined and literate....and now not "warlike"(???!!!).
Oh, and your snarky little insults at the end of every post are crap as well.
Yeah, I'M the "warlike" one!
and expects people to believe her. Calls abortion clinics baby killing mills and expects people to believe her.
Uses speech such as hogwash, bilge and crud to "criticize" other people's ideas.
and expects people to believe her.<<<<<
You don't have to believe me at all. No one does. That does not change the truth one bit.
>>>>> Calls abortion clinics baby killing mills and expects people to believe her.<<<<<
Again, DUH.
>>>>>Uses speech such as hogwash, bilge and crud to "criticize" other people's ideas.<<<<
And at the same time I explain WHY they oare hogwash, etc.
>>>>>js absolves herself of any responsibility for anything her country of citizenship does because she didn't vote for Obama. <<<<
I did not participate in the ritual sham of choosing my own ruler. I do not consent to this system/worldview. It is being forced on me. "Citizenship" is a scam, a hoax, a farce for the dumbed down. You really believe that Obama was elected (and is a "citizen")?? You really believe that "The People" wanted these wars, these fat cat bailouts (of EUROPEAN banks, yet!!)??>>
>>>>>I have not excused it or supported it or claimed it was necessary or good.<<<<
Then WHY on earth this insistence that ALL must participate in it??
>>>>> Neither has Amy. More cop outs to try to prove how noble and good you are, when you are but another coward who is too timid to protest taxes, war or anything else.<<<<<
LOL!! Apparently you missed the thread about the actual selecting out of populations troublemakers to the existing order via identifying them and doing away with them in order to create a population of meek "citizens" who fight amongst themselves instead of rebelling against their masters. Yes. I MUST go stand in front of a tank in Tianamen Square or Washington to PROVE to YOU how noble and good I am. No thanks. I have wasted enough time "protesting", "making my voice heard", etc. You will just have to despise my "cowardice". I will continue to expose the legalized mafia for what they are and you will continue to defend them and attack me for NOT loving them as you do.
>>>> You merely know how to chatter on this forum, as if that is accomplishing something.<<<
That tidy little "ending" again. I am aware of you low opinion of me. I will try to bear the pain of the knowledge that the resident commie change agent on this forum disappproves of me.
A zygote, an embryo and a fetus is not a BABY, as you insist.
>>>>>A zygote, an embryo and a fetus is not a BABY, as you insist.<<<<
Oh, really? Butcher as many babies as you can and the ones who escape your scapels you try to steal from their parents. Why do you hate children and babies? Why do you hate the family so? Why do you hate PEOPLE so much?
>>>>>>Quote:
>>>>>I have not excused it or supported it or claimed it was necessary or good.<<<<
???!!!!!!??? LOL!!!!
>>>>>>Then WHY on earth this insistence that ALL must participate in it??
>>>>> Neither has Amy. More cop outs to try to prove how noble and good you are, when you are but another coward who is too timid to protest taxes, war or anything else.<<<<
Taxes are theft under threat of violence. For WHATEVER reason, even reasons you like money stolen for. State humans are no better than other humans.
>>>>>>>>Quote:
I will continue to expose the legalized mafia for what they are and you will continue to defend them and attack me for NOT loving them as you do.
I never said I loved legalized mafia, which is another good example of how you misrepresent what I say here.<<<<<<
Your NONSTOP insistence that I participate in my own enslavement by the state is certainly illogical then.
>>>>>>>>Quote:
resident commie change agent
I am not a resident commie change agent. Repeating it a million times doesn't make it so, except in your own addled mind.,,,,
No, what makes it so is your relentless insistence that ALL participate in your state system, all pay the state whatever they demand or else be condemned as selfish, that parents have no right to rear their own offspring as they see fit, that people who worship other than you do are evil and stupid (Quiverfulls), and that "Climate Change" is justification for the stripping of further property rights...oh and your love of all things tax funded (community centers, kidjails,Canadas educational experiments). That is SOME of what makes you a commie change agent.
>>>>>Neither is Riane Eisler a slimebag, nor Mitch Hall a nutjob.<<<<
Yes, they are and for reasons I have already gone into.
>>>>>>And citizenship, according to Gatto, is not "a scam, a hoax, a farce for the dumbed down." Why don't you write to Gatto and tell him how dumbed down he is?<<<<<<
I think he knows it.
Climate Science Watch
"Referring to Charles and David Koch as "The Tea Partiers," Rolling Stone says:
"The multibillionaire brothers not only run the nation's largest private energy company, they rival Exxon in funding the front groups that spread disinformation about the dangers of climate change... As author Thomas Frank observes in What's the Matter With Kansas?, `Koch money subsidizes the mass production of bad ideas...'"
And how many of those bad ideas end up here, on John Taylor Gatto's education forum. Is this the forum for bad ideas?
I don't promote the Koch Neocons.
No, you just soak up all their PR on how global warming is a hoax.
The hoaxsters ADMITTED it!
You are hilarious! Still insisting that only the NY Slimes and MSM of that lefty ilk Speak Truth! Can't have any NEOCON propaganda getting in the way of your Marxist propaganda.
But they are telling you and you believe them. Where do you think the bulk of "it's a hoax" commentary originated? lewrockwell.com?
The jury is still out on climate warming, but you accept all the biased media conclusions on the topic at the same time that you ridicule others for accepting MSM opinions in the "Sheeple Quiz."
And you apparently cannot distinguish MARKET propaganda from science. After all, your biased views are aligned with those of the Koch brothers.
Responding to this is a waste of time. I have posted on all of this before for those interested in living VOLUNTARILY cooperating rather than being perfected into approved "citizens" at gunpoint.
Those who WANT to live being ruled by other humans should have that option, of course. They simply cannot demand we ALL have to join them.
I guess consistency is one way to describe your pre-thought thoughts that come in cookie-cutter recipes from lewrockwell.com.
Care to list all those original, never been thought before revelations YOU have birthed on this forum from that vast intellect you think you have?
It's OK, attack LRC, the premier anti-state libertarian portal. It exposes you for the hater of liberty and humanity and state lover that you are.
Father Barron
"Now to give Michael Moore his due, there are elements of the Catholic social teaching tradition, which stretches back to Jesus and the Old Testament prophets that support his point of view. In Rerum Novarum, the great text that inaugurated modern Catholic social doctrine, Pope Leo XIII comments that once the demands of necessity and propriety have been met, everything else we own belongs to the poor. I submit to you that if you allow that statement to sink into soul, it will cause a good deal of spiritual and moral discomfort. He furthermore sternly warns the wealthy that their salvation will, to some degree, depend upon their generosity to the poor. Cardinal Francis George of Chicago echoed Pope Leo when he said to a group of wealthy donors some years ago that the poor needed them for their temporal well-being but that they needed the poor in order to avoid going to Hell! More to it, all of the Popes who have written on social matters, from Leo to Benedict XVI, have insisted that the government has a moral obligation to regulate the economy when gross injustices mar the system. In the measure, therefore, that the recent economic collapse was precipitated by an irresponsible deregulation of the financial markets, Michael Moore is right to raise an authentically Catholic voice in protest against it."
Is this the part on Catholic social teaching and justice that you find "non-binding"?
Your silence on the topic does not surprise me.
At least you're reading something besides Riane Eisler.
Nope. Don't agree with Fr. Barron on Marxist Michael Moores "authentic" Catholicism".
There can be voluntary "social justice", like Mother theresa. Note that Fr Barron referred to DONORS, implying VOLUNTARY support to the poor rather than state looting you find so "just".
That is the variety I support. Not Moores (or anyones) "social justice" at gunpoint. Keep looking, there are lots of Marxist priests blathering about "social justice" and promoting wealth redistribution. Bella Dodd wrote about her part in the infiltration.
And no, their ideas are not Church dogma...yet. When they become that I'll part ways with them.
Since you are researching Church teaching read up on the Scholastics at Salamanca, the first economists.
I see. Father Barron is a good film critic, but that's as far as it goes.
I wasn't researching Church teaching. Just thought I'd see what you thought about Father Barron's opinions in this case.
I disagree that one can be a state worshipping Marxist wealth distributor and have an "authentic Catholic" opinion. I doubt Barron would agree. There is nothing wrong with praying for rulers and slavemasters to be just. Or calling on existing governments to be just.
© 2000-2001 The Odysseus Group
Suite 3W 295 East 8th Street NY, NY 10009
Phone Toll Free: 888 211-7164 Fax: 212 529-3555
E-mail:info@johntaylorgatto.com